Showing posts with label Advocacy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Advocacy. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 28, 2011

How to Find Grant Opportunities

Every leader, employee, board member and volunteer with a nonprofit, tax exempt, nongovernmental organization is looking for grants. This Blog post will give you e-newsletters and two Twitter accounts where you can receive grant and scholarship information daily or weekly at no cost.

There are thousands of local, state, regional and national foundations and corporations that accept grant proposals. But each has its own requirements, process, mission, eligibility, forms, reporting and accountability standards. The Foundation Center and others have large data bases that are for sale.  But there are source to find grant opportunities that cost nothing. There are e-newsletters and Twitter messages available to keep you up to date on many grant possibilities.  How do you keep up with Federal sources of grants? Again there are free e-newsletters available.

You should also be alert to your state or province government and local foundations that provide grants. Your local United Way or similar organization may have information they are willing to share.  

The most difficult process to secure funding for nonprofits is through the grant writing activity. Folks starting out should first have in place a resource development plan that includes grant seeking and also, fund (friend-) raising, use of social media, events, capital funding, social enterprise (not for everyone), volunteers, collect dues, user fees, contracts for service, sell products, equipment donations and so on.  

The place to start seeking grants is in your local delivery area, town, city, county, parish, province, state. Developing relationships and friends is absolutely critical, not only for fundraising but also for securing grants and finding leads to sources of funding. Making friends and developing contacts takes work by the board, volunteers and staff.  The organization has to develop spheres of influence among its supporters, people who share the organization’s mission, activities and values.   

There are a number of places to find information easily and on the cheap...no money. There are a number of e-mail notices about grants which I am listing here. One source of grant funds is corporate giving such as grocery chains, utility companies, pharmaceutical companies, national products and others. I have not found any common source for that information. It takes digging.


Corporations are more likely to give to programs that are in their community, an office, manufacturing plant, research and development center, any physical presence. A corporation is even more likely to provide support if an employee volunteers or serves on the board of the organization.


Nongovernmental organizations (NGO) in Third World countries should see where there are international companies, offices, excavation, mining, research and development, manufacturing, security and so on. They may provide support, not always money, for the project that matches up with their business model. I am sensitive to the fact that many international companies can be the source of problems in Third World countries.  I have seen, however, some international companies not only from the US but also Sweden, Norway, Australia, India provide help to NGOs and provide help for individual children in need of serious medical attention when referred by a NGO.

Program precedes money. Planning precedes program. You start by doing something toward your mission. There are no funders sitting around looking for people to fund. They rarely fund start-ups. They are looking for organizations that meet THEIR mission and requirements. See

For daily, instant and timely grant notices you can follow me on Twitter, @dgriesmann  


For daily scholarship information opportunities, follow @ScholarshipsGL on Twitter  

Federal grant notices by agency, a hit-and-miss proposition but absolutely valuable - http://www07.grants.gov/applicants/email_subscription.jsp   


Federal Register Table of Contents published daily - Lengthy listing of the Federal government at work, meeting announcements, and publications about rules and so on. This used to be the only place to find grants but not any longer. Still, I have found grants through this source not listed elsewhere. It will take about 1-3 minutes to scan the Table of Contents, click on Online mailing list archives,   http://listserv.access.gpo.gov/

GrantsAlert.com for education grants from Joseph B Mizereck and Associates Inc also features fellowships and awards for educators http://www.grantsalert.com/  

FundingAlert from the Washington DC Mayor's Office of Partnerships, small number of listings, mostly Federal but I have found some gems here http://opgs.dc.gov/opgd/cwp/view,a,1318,q,587660,opgdNav,%7C34802%7C.asp

GrantStation through their Insider newsletter or multiple sources, small number of listings but very helpful with descriptions, deadlines and links, http://www.grantstation.com/
1.    
Youth Service America, sign up for newsletters, http://ysa.org/about 
2.    
National Human Services Assembly, sign up for newsletter, http://nassembly.org/
3.    
Capital Venture from Linda Lysakowski http://www.cvfundraising.com/

Miami-Dade Grant Opportunities newsletter, an excellent source with brief descriptions, deadlines and links by categories http://miamidade.gov/wps/portal/Main/grantsmembers

Foundation Center PND RFP Bulletin http://foundationcenter.org/newsletters/


For international grants:


UK Office for Civil Society Funding Central newsletter , create a profile and subscribe to the newsletter “Reminders of approaching deadlines ” or one  that interests you,  http://www.fundingcentral.org.uk/profile.aspx 

Are you sure your organization is ready to receive and appropriately account for the assistance from a grant? Before you say “Yes”, please read this 

One Phase of Nonprofit Organizational Readiness for Grant Funding – Recordkeeping  

Thursday, November 5, 2009

AIDS and Nonprofits – A New Resource Tracking Tool; Where’s the Money for AIDS?

On Tuesday, November 17th, 2009 Funders Concerned About AIDS (FCAA) and the European HIV/AIDS Funders Group (EFG) will jointly launch our annual resource tracking publications, U.S. Philanthropic Support to Address HIV/AIDS in 2008 and European Philanthropic Support to Address HIV/AIDS in 2008. In this article you will also find synopses and references to reports about the dwindling giving for AIDS in the U.S. and Globally. For nonprofits and nongovernmental organizations this is known only too well and the rest of us need to hear it also. I have also added links to possible grants.

Funders Concerned About AIDS and the European HIV/AIDS Funders Group Report

What can you expect in this year’s reports?

• New insights into U.S. and European HIV/AIDS funding trends from 2005 through 2008;

• Grantmaker forecasts on 2009 HIV/AIDS-related funding levels;

• Notable geographic trends in international and domestic HIV/AIDS funding;

• Narrative profiles highlighting examples of funder innovation;

• An enhanced directory and select profiles of funding organizations located outside of the U.S. and Western and Central Europe engaged in HIV/AIDS.

A New Approach for 2009

This year we’re doing things differently. To encourage you to access and share this critical assessment of U.S. and European philanthropic investment in HIV/AIDS, we’re giving you the publications in multiple formats.

Beginning on November 17th, you can find a new Resource Tracking Toolkit on the FCAA and EFG websites.

Now, in one convenient package you will be able to:

• View a PowerPoint presentation of the key data highlights;

• Download the PDF publications, press release, and slides of select charts and highlighted trends;

• Learn how other top funders communicate the impact of their role in HIV/AIDS philanthropy to their constituencies.

The toolkit will provide you with the resources to share this critical new data with your colleagues, grantees and Board to underscore the importance of your work.

How can you use this information?

• Reinforce your presentations and meetings with key messages, data points and new context for HIV/AIDS philanthropy;

• Demonstrate the impact of your institution’s role in HIV/AIDS philanthropy and strengthen internal support for your grantmaking with foundation boards, colleagues and other key stakeholders;

• Identify new colleagues and issues for potential collaboration and new issue areas or strategies to enhance the effectiveness and reach of your HIV/AIDS funding;

• Help the field of HIV/AIDS philanthropy grow by encouraging your colleagues, partners and Board members to participate in resource tracking;

• Tell us what you think and how you use this information! Your feedback will help us continue to enhance this product every year.

RSVP by Friday, November 13th to receive an email when these materials are available online. RSVP by e-mail mailto:rsvp@fcaaids.org

GLOBAL: AIDS funding at "dangerous turning point"

JOHANNESBURG, 5 November 2009 (PlusNews) - Wavering international support for HIV/AIDS efforts is resulting in funding shortfalls that could wipe out a decade of progress in rolling out AIDS treatment, the international medical and humanitarian organization, Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), has warned.

In a report called "Punishing Success? Early signs of a retreat from commitment to HIV/AIDS care and treatment", released on 5 November, MSF highlights worrying indications that the two biggest international funders helping developing countries expand their AIDS programmes are starting to scale back or flatline their contributions.

The board of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, which largely relies on money from developed countries to award grants in 140 poor countries, will soon decide whether to cancel its 2010 call for funding proposals.

If so, it will be the organization's first year since 2002 without a funding round; the total amount of HIV grants recommended for funding in 2009 was 35 percent lower than in 2008.

Countries like Malawi are heavily dependent on Global Fund grants to finance their antiretroviral (ARV) treatment programmes. The MSF report notes that with the Fund in crisis, Malawi's chances of achieving universal access to treatment are sinking.

For the full report and the recent acts by the Obama administration please see

http://www.plusnews.org/Report.aspx?Reportid=86902

Where is the funding for AIDS? Most of the funds are going to research, not prevention, treatment and support of people infected with and affected by HIV/AIDS

SOME FUNDING RESOURCES FOR HIV/AIDS

USAID/Uganda
The deadline is November 30, 2009
http://www07.grants.gov/search/search.do?&mode=VIEW&flag2006=false&oppId=49821

U.S. National Institutes of Health
The deadline is November 18, 2009.
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-DA-10-008.html

STARS Foundation Impact Awards
The deadline is 19 January 2010
http://www.starsfoundation.org.uk/impact-awards/how-to-apply/

USAID/Malawi
Closing Date for Round 1 Concept Paper Submission: November 30, 2009

Closing Date for Annual Program Statement (APS): September 7, 2010
http://www07.grants.gov/search/search.do?&mode=VIEW&flag2006=false&oppId=49399

Hivos, the Humanist Institute for Development Cooperation
Applications are accepted throughout the year. There is no deadline.
http://www.hivos.nl/eng/content/view/full/5441

Jerome Robbins Foundation
There are no deadlines
http://jeromerobbins.org/

USAID/Uganda
The deadline is November 30, 2009
http://www07.grants.gov/search/search.do?&mode=VIEW&flag2006=false&oppId=49821

United Kingdom Comic Relief
Deadlines - 20 November 2009 and 5 March 2010
http://www.comicrelief.com/apply_for_a_grant

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

The Stories of Nonprofits Dying

This article will look at two levels of information about what is happening to nonprofit organizations around the U.S. as the result of the recession. The first part will be news headlines and brief synopsis of the news article with links. This is a sampling of the articles I have read across the country. All have the same message. The second part will be the listing of studies and survey results nationally and locally with links that have been published about what is happening economically to giving and support of nonprofit organization. The first study by Giving USA 2009 had national attention for a 2% drop in giving. There are other studies that did not get the same national splash that indicate the drop is 40% or higher. Each part will be in chronological order from June into August, 2009. I have placed a few final remarks at the end – lessons I have learned from all this. I am very passionate about the mission and work that nonprofits can and do perform and these are sad moments. We will see what the the resilience of the third sector is in the next 15-24 months.

Within two days after this blog was posted two new studies show a worsening position for nonprofit organizations. First, volunteers are reducing the time they spend doing that work. Second the number of wealthy giving of $1M + gifts have significantly dropped in 2009, another sign of reduced support. These stories follow - .

Volunteering Waning in Recession, Report Says By STEPHANIE STROM Published: August 26, 2009

As the recession took hold, most Americans cut back on volunteer work and other civic activities, according to a survey conducted for the National Conference on Citizenship.

That finding undercuts anecdotal reports of volunteers’ flooding nonprofit groups as unemployment has increased and suggests the challenges faced by the Obama administration, Congress and foundations working to encourage greater volunteer service and civic participation.
“They’re not saying they’ve stopped volunteering, but they are cutting back on the time spent on volunteering and civic engagement,” said David Smith, executive director of the National Conference on Citizenship, which conducted the survey as part of a study titled America’s Civic Health Index,

(Snip)

The decline in volunteerism is not good news for nonprofits, which are relying on volunteers to help offset declining revenues. In a study by the Listening Post Project, affiliated with the Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies, about 4 in 10 of the responding nonprofits said they had increased their use of volunteers, and almost half said they planned to use more volunteers over the next year.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/27/us/27volunteer.html?_r=1&hp

Giving by the Wealthy Drops Sharply in 2009 Chronicle of Philanthropy August 25, 2009

The recession appears to be cutting significantly into giving at the peak of the fund-raising pyramid.

Only two individuals have announced gifts of $100-million or more in 2009, according to The Chronicle of Philanthropy’s database of America’s top donors.

(Snip)

By comparison, The Chronicle documented 21 gifts of $100-million or more in 2008. And 10 of those gifts exceeded $200-million.

http://philanthropy.com/news/prospecting/9278/giving-by-the-wealth-drops-sharply-in-2009

NEWS ARTICLES
2008: Giving Dropped $6.4 Billion; Largest Decline On Record (June 9, 2009)

http://www.nptimes.com/09Jun/bnews-givingusa-090610.html

Texas Association of Nonprofit Organizations (June 9, 2009)

Charitable Donations Fell by Nearly 6% in 2008, the Sharpest Drop in 53 Years

http://www.tano.org/en/art/457/

From the Chronicle of Philanthropy June 10, 2009

Donations to nearly every type of charity faltered in 2008, as contributions declined by 5.7 percent last year after adjustment for inflation, according to the new edition of Giving USA, The Chronicle of Philanthropy reports. It was the steepest decline in the history of the survey, which has been conducted since 1956

http://philanthropy.com/news/?id=8520&pth&utm_source=pt&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_content=lefttop

2008 U.S. Charitable Giving Estimated to be $307.65 Billion (2 percent drop in current dollars over 2007) Posted by: philcrosby on Wednesday, June 10, 2009

http://www.pnnonline.org/article.php?sid=8866

Charitable Donations Fell in 2008, Report Finds - Washington Post (June 10, 2009)

Individual donations dropped by about 2.7 percent from 2007 to last year, corporate giving fell by about 4.5 percent and foundation contributions grew by about 3 percent, according to the report.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/09/AR2009060903233.html?hpid=moreheadlines

Plan for Dozens of Salvation Army Centers Falters By STEPHANIE STROM Published: by the NY Times June 14, 2009

At her death in 2003, Joan B. Kroc, the widow of the founder of the McDonald’s Corporation, left a grand idea and $1.8 billion to make it happen. She wanted the Salvation Army to build some 30 lavish community centers around the nation, like the $87 million complex she paid for in San Diego, with three swimming pools, an indoor ice skating arena and a 600-seat theater.

But more than five years later, her plan is sputtering.

The gift has always rested uncomfortably with some Salvation Army officials, who have a hard time reconciling the elaborate centers with the Army’s image as a frugal church that serves the needy.

Now, the plan is also proving difficult to finance. The Kroc fortune has been battered by the economic downturn, and raising additional money to make sure the centers can sustain themselves in the future has been challenging.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/15/us/15salvation.html?_r=1&emc=eta1

Guggenheim Will Cut 8 Percent of Its Positions By CAROL VOGEL Published NY Times - June 16, 2009

The foundation that runs the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum said on Tuesday that despite record attendance, it will cut 25 positions, or 8 percent of the institution’s full-time staff.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/17/arts/design/17guggenheim.html?_r=2&ref=arts

Princeton University to offer early retirement Wednesday, June 17, 2009 BY KRYSTAL KNAPP SPECIAL TO THE Times of Trenton Regional News

The early retirement incentive program is the university's latest move in response to an expected one-year endowment decline of nearly 30 percent, or $5 billion, by June 30. The university draws more than 45 percent of its operating revenue from the endowment. Due to the decline of the endowment, school officials are looking to cut $170 million from the budget during the next two fiscal years.

http://www.j.com/news/times/regional/index.ssf?/base/news-17/1245211525322950.xml&coll=5

Big Grant Makers Cut Staff Members from Chronicle of Philanthropy June 22, 2009
Facing huge losses in their endowments since the onset of the global financial crisis, some of America’s largest foundations are cutting jobs, reports The New York Times.

Last week, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, in Princeton, N.J., offered buyouts to 42 percent of its 250 employees. Last month, the Ford Foundation, in New York, offered a similar deal to 140 of its 550 staff members. In December, The California Endowment, in Los Angeles, cut 44 jobs. This year, the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, in Battle Creek, Mich., has closed offices in Brazil, Mississippi, and South Africa, resulting in more than a dozen jobs lost.

The job cuts are coming after grant makers have already cut costs using other methods, says Bradford K. Smith, president of the Foundation Center, a research group in New York.

“I think we’re just at the beginning of this process,” he said, though he added that only a fraction of the nation’s private grant makers — about 4,000 out of more than 90,000 foundations — employed workers other than the founder or family members.

http://philanthropy.com/news/?id=8631&pth&utm_source=pt&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_content=lefttop

Metropolitan Museum Completes Cuts, Buyouts, Losing 357 Staff By Philip Boroff June 23, 2009 Bloomberg.com

New York’s Metropolitan Museum of Art completed job cuts announced in March and reduced staff by 14 percent, or 357 positions, according to a press release.

The Met had said it would cut about 10 percent of its staff. Spokesman Harold Holzer said in an interview that about 40 percent of those offered early retirement packages accepted them, higher than it expected, and the museum was able to close down 15 of its 16 satellite shops, also more than expected.

“We weren’t certain we could close all those shops because of rental agreements,” Holzer said.

The museum said it fired 53 people at the shops around the country and another 74 at its merchandising operation. It has just one shop remaining in addition to its Fifth Avenue museum, at Rockefeller Center.

A total of 95 employees ages 55 or over with at least 15 years at the museum took a buyout, according to the press release. In the past two weeks, it dismissed 74 union and non- union employees, the museum said. Other positions were eliminated through attrition.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601088&sid=aLxXS2MdbOkU

Ford Ahead: The Foundation Tightens Its Belt By MARK HEMINGWAY JUNE 26, 2009 Wall Street Journal

The Ford Foundation recently announced that it would be offering buyouts to one-third of its 550 employees. On the surface, the reason seems obvious: too little money. Right now, the foundation has $9 billion in assets. That may sound like a lot of money, but it is $4 billion less than last year, thanks to the country's financial crisis. And if Ford were a business, belt-tightening would be the expected response. But in the world of philanthropy, Ford's drastic action has come as a surprise.

Now all eyes are on Luis Ubinas, who since becoming president of the foundation last year has been trying to streamline its operations. In some sense, Ford is late to this philanthropic trend. Since the $27 billion Gates Foundation arrived on the scene, its founder has helped spread responsible business practices to philanthropy. And conservative foundations such as The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation and the John M. Olin Foundation have shown that they can sometimes outflank bigger, more established liberal foundations by being leaner and more focused. Ford's spending, by contrast, has reached almost governmental proportions. As of last year, it had offices in 13 countries and gave away $539 million to 1,997 organizations. Indeed, for decades Ford executives operated as if immune to the forces of capitalism.

But its extravagance has led to problems far beyond those now being felt by its staff. Ford's financial autonomy fostered a confused philanthropic mission that has the foundation slouching toward irrelevance. Mr. Ubinas, a former McKinsey consultant, may be well-qualified to deal with Ford's fiscal problems. What's not clear is whether he has a well-defined strategy for clarifying its mission and ending its scattershot approach to grant-making

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124598045813858017.html#mod=todays_us_weekend_journal

Banks Turn Away From ‘Planned Giving’ Wall Street Journal (July 28, 2009) By SHELLY BANJO

While planned giving programs steadily gain popularity with charities and their donors, they’re becoming less popular with the banks that service them.

Some key banks are retreating from this area of financial management, refusing to take on charities with less than $1 million or $5 million in assets. Some are dropping clients who don’t make the cut.

That’s putting a squeeze on smaller organizations, many of which depend on planned-giving vehicles to bring in donations and rely on banks to manage the often-complex programs.
More than 50 charities are scrambling to find a new bank after BNY Mellon Wealth Management—one of the biggest players in the planned giving investment arena—in May gave clients until Sept. 1 to find a new manager.

Comprising charitable gift annuities and trusts, planned gifts have become a mainstay for many nonprofits, particularly in a recession, when donors are squeezed for cash and shy away from outright gifts. Finding a new service provider typically takes up to a year.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052970204563304574314882717782344.html#mod=todays_us_personal_journal
Metro Atlanta non-profits saw need rise, donations fall in 1Q By Christopher Quinn The Atlanta Journal-Constitution (July 30, 2009)

Metro Atlanta nonprofits reported rising need and sinking donations through the first three months of 2009.

Those trends track what is happening nationally as the economy torpedoes giving, while the same economy is pushing more people to reach out to nonprofits for help.

“I have been at it 25 years, and I have never seen anything like it,” said Jim Seiler, the Atlanta area commander for the Salvation Army.

His organization built a new 80-bed shelter for homeless families in downtown Atlanta, but now that the shelter is complete, the Salvation Army does not have the money to staff and operate it.
The Georgia Center for Nonprofits released new figures from its quarterly survey Thursday to a group of local organizational leaders. It began tracking quarterly trends at nonprofits at the end of 2008. The strains that showed up then have exacerbated.

Twenty-five percent of the about 200 nonprofits surveyed said donations have decreased, compared to 19 percent during the last quarter of 2008.

At the same time, 61 percent of those surveyed in early 2009 said demand for services has increased.

Nonprofits in 2009 are dipping more often into reserve funds (nearly 40 percent compared to 32 percent) delaying programs (42 percent compared to 37 percent) and cutting staff (31 percent compared to 27 percent).

There are a few bright spots, said Karen Beavor, the CEO of the Georgia Center for Nonprofits. The survey shows nine percent of nonprofits said their foundation grants went up in early 2009. Nonprofits are getting more creative and collaborative to fill the gaps.

But it is tough for everyone, and she predicted a tougher second quarter and third quarter before the holiday lift that charities get during November and December.

http://www.ajc.com/news/metro-atlanta-104753.html

With Donations and Grants Down, Social Service Agencies Feel the Pinch by DIANE CARDWELL Published: August 21, 2009

At a social service agency on Staten Island where budget cuts forced the layoff of a driver, the staff scrambles to arrange transportation to Brooklyn for an elderly homeless woman whose family has agreed to take her in.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/22/nyregion/22nonprofit.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=donations&st=

Fundraisers’ outlook remains gloomy - August 10, 2009 Philanthropy Journal

Fundraisers for U.S. nonprofits paint a dark funding picture for their organizations, and the next six months are expected to bring only slight clearing, a new study says.

The current environment for fundraising worsened over the past six months, with the Present Situation Index falling to 28.9 percent over the past year to 58.0 on a 100-point scale, the lowest since the Index's inception in 1998, says a report from the Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University.

The Philanthropic Giving Index, which is comprised of the Present Situation Index and the Expectations Index, measures fundraisers' optimism about the current and future climate for fundraising.

The Expectations Index, which measures expectations for the coming six months, is up 10.2 percent over the past six months to 78.2.

However, over the past 12 months, the Expectations Index has dropped 13.2 percent.
Almost nine in 10 fundraisers say the economy is having a negative or very negative effect on their development operations currently, while six in 10 say they expect that to continue over the next six months.

(Snip)

While major gifts are down 23.1 percent and foundation grants are off 39.2 percent, two in three fundraisers say they are still having success with direct mail.

http://www.philanthropyjournal.org/news/fundraisers’-outlook-remains-gloomy

STUDIES
U.S. charitable giving estimated to be $307.65 billion in 2008 Giving in worst economic climate since Great Depression exceeds $300 billion for second year in a row by Giving USA FoundationTM

Glenview, Ill. (June 10, 2009)—Charitable giving in the United States exceeded $300 billion for the second year in a row in 2008, according to Giving USA 2009. Donations to charitable causes in the United States reached an estimated $307.65 billion in 2008, a 2 percent drop in current dollars over 2007.

The 2008 number is the first decline in giving in current dollars since 1987 and the second since Giving USA began publishing annual reports in 1956, says the annual report on philanthropy, released today for the 54th year by Giving USA FoundationTM. ( http://www.givingusa.org/ ) Revised estimated giving for 2007 was a record $314.07 billion.

Two-thirds of public charities receiving donations saw decreases in 2008. The exceptions were Religion, Public-Society Benefit and International Affairs. The other types of charities (or subsectors) examined in Giving USA are: Arts/Culture/Humanities; Education; Environment/Animals; Health; Human Services; and Foundations, says the report, which is researched and written for Giving USA Foundation by the Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University.

http://www.givingusa.org/press_releases/gusa/GivingReaches300billion.pdf

New Report Finds DC Area's Nonprofits Lack Funds to Weather Economic Crisis Wednesday, June 24, 2009
Washington, DC – Most nonprofits don't have the financial reserves needed to weather the current economic crisis, according to a new report released by the Urban Institute and funded by the Eugene and Agnes E. Meyer Foundation in Washington, DC. The study, the first of its kind, examined the operating reserves of more than 2,500 nonprofits in the Greater Washington area, ranging in mission from soup kitchens and job training centers to schools and local arts groups.

Operating reserves—cash and other liquid assets without donor restrictions that can be tapped when income falls short of expenses—are an important indicator of an organization's financial health and its ability to survive challenging times. The study reviewed financial data for Greater Washington's locally-focused nonprofits over a six-year period from 2000 to 2006.

Among the report's key findings:
  • In 2006, a time of relative economic stability, nonprofits in the Greater Washington area had a median operating reserve of 2.1 months of expenses. Most nonprofit financial management experts recommend a minimum of three.
  • 57% had operating reserves of less than three months of operating expenses; 28% of those had no reserves at all.
  • The percentage of organizations with less than three months in operating reserves increases with size, making large organizations (those with annual budgets of $5 million or more) especially vulnerable to the economic downturn.
  • Arts, culture, and humanities organizations had the highest percentage of groups with less than the minimum reserve (62%); environment and animal organizations had the lowest with 46% falling below recommended levels.
  • Nearly one in six nonprofit organizations that filed tax returns in 2000 appeared to have gone out of business or had shrunk below the IRS reporting threshold ($25,000 in revenue) by 2006; these groups had lower operating reserves and were more dependent on private contributions than the organizations that survived.
http://www.meyerfoundation.org/newsroom/press_releases/504

2009 Data Sheds Insights into Giving USA Study
Horsham, PA, June 24, 2009 — A recently released study from the Giving USA Foundation reported that charitable giving from 2007 to 2008 dropped 2% (measured in current dollars; giving declined 5.7 percent in inflation-adjusted dollars). A further analysis released today by DonorPerfect fundraising software examined giving results from a sample of their clients between 2008 vs. 2007. This analysis also looked at client results from the first quarter 2009 vs. 2008. It revealed 2008 charitable giving was greatly affected by a steep decline in donations seen in November and December 2008. It further revealed that if first quarter trends continue, 2009 could be worse than 2008.
Jon Biedermann, Vice President at SofterWare and developer of DonorPerfect, noted “Giving USA’s annual estimates are based on econometric studies from an array of sources and data, whereas our analysis is based on aggregated actual donations recorded by a wide variety of clients. This method allows us to analyze the data monthly, which provides additional insights into fluctuations. Although our donation results are higher than Giving USA, they’re consistent with a multi-year analysis that shows DonorPerfect clients improve their fundraising results above the national average of all nonprofits. Besides these differences, it still tracks well as a snapshot of giving results and provides insight into 2009 trends."
Trends for 2009
An analysis for the first quarter 2009 shows an 8.4% decline vs. the 2008 first quarter. This shows improvement from the steep drop in November and December 2008. However, Mr. Biedermann further noted that “… unless this improving trend continues, there is a good chance that overall giving in the USA in 2009 may be down more than the 2% reported by Giving USA in 2008, perhaps even as low as -10%! The obvious fear from these indicators is that cash-strapped nonprofits will need to reduce services at the very time when they will be needed most.”
http://www.donorperfect.com//press-release/donation-report-2009.asp
Revenue, Donors Continue Free Fall By Mark Hrywna June 25, 2009 NonProfit Times
It’s no surprise that revenue continues to fall but the number of new donors also continues its drop, declining almost 13 percent in the first quarter of 2009, as compared to 2008.
Key metrics in the Target Analytics Index of National Fundraising Performance declined as a whole for the first quarter of 2009 as compared to the same time last year. The index -- released today (6/25) by Target Analytics, a Blackbaud company -- analyzes direct marketing giving for 79 national organizations.

Most organizations suffered declines in key measures for 2008 as a result of the struggling economy, but the new trends are now more widespread across the index.

Index donor declines are due primarily to declines in new donor numbers, which have fallen faster than overall donor numbers since the 2005 hurricanes, and have fallen three times faster since the recession began in 2007 than they had in either of the previous two years.

http://www.nptimes.com/instantfund/09Jun/IF-090625-1.html

Fundraising Dips In First Quarter Of 2009 Sunday, June 28, 2009 at 07:44PM by Allyson Kapin

The struggling economy hit nonprofits hard in the first quarter of 2009. According to the latest Target Analytics Index of National Fundraising Performance, the number of new donors dropped by almost 13%, as compared to 2008. The study analyzed 79 nonprofit organizations and their fundraising campaigns via direct mail, online fundraising, telemarketing and canvassing.

The study also showed that for the first time since Target Analytics released its initial study in 2002, overall revenue per donor declined by 2.1%. Prior to this study, the Index of the National Fundraising Performance had only been showing a gradual decline in donor numbers since the U.S. Gulf Coast hurricanes of 2005. However, things rapidly changed from Q4 in 2008 to Q1 in 2009. The decline in donors accelerated even faster due to the recession and a 13% decrease in new donors.

http://www.frogloop.com/dips

Nonprofits Employ Tougher Measures as Downturn Deepens: Bridgespan Survey Shows 41 Percent Turning to Layoffs, 33 Percent Reserve Draw-Downs, but Also Hope June 29, 2009, 12:01 a.m. EST

BOSTON, Jun 29, 2009 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- The negative effects of the economy on nonprofit organizations has accelerated over the last six months, according to responses from nearly 100 nonprofit leaders participating in a Bridgespan study initiated in November 2008 and updated in May 2009. The percentage of nonprofits that have resorted to layoffs, broad-based programmatic reductions, and reserve draw-downs has increased measurably. Nevertheless nonprofit leaders appear to be optimistic about the future. Almost half of the respondents reported that they believed their organization would be on stronger financial footing in a year's time.

Since that initial survey, the country has a new President, and a new budget and stimulus package. Nonetheless, as the economic crisis has deepened, the situation for nonprofits has continued to deteriorate. According to Bridgespan partner William Foster, "This survey highlights just how tough times really are. Ninety-two percent of nonprofits responding to the May 2009 survey indicated they were experiencing the effects of the downturn, up from 75 percent in November. Forty-nine percent reported that their financial situation had worsened, and the percentage of nonprofits reporting funding cuts has increased from 52 percent to 69 percent. Further, the percentage reporting cuts of more than 20 percent has increased from 13 percent to 24 percent."

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/nonprofits-employ-tougher-measures-as-downturn-deepens-bridgespan-survey-shows-41-percent-turning-to-layoffs-33-percent-reserve-draw-downs-but-also-hope

Managing in Tough Times: May 2009 Nonprofit Leaders Survey Update Published Date: 2009-06-29 Author(s): William Foster Gail Perreault Sarah Sable

Responses of nearly 100 nonprofit leaders participating in a Bridgespan longitudinal study show nonprofits are turning to much tougher measures than foreseen six months ago to cope with the economic downturn. The percentage of nonprofits that have resorted to layoffs has increased, as has the percentage that has made broad-based programmatic reductions. More organizations have drawn down their reserves. Nonprofit leaders appear to be optimistic about the future, though: Almost half of the respondents reported that they believe their organization will be on stronger financial footing in a year’s time. And two thirds have employed contingency planning, a key step for weathering the storm, as outlined in our original November 2008 report “Managing in Tough Times: 7 Steps.”

These current findings follow from results of that November study, in which the Bridgespan Group surveyed nonprofit leaders across the U.S. to find out how the economic downturn was affecting their organizations. We reached out to approximately 800 nonprofit chief executive officers, presidents, and executive directors; more than 100 responded. At the time, many nonprofit organizations were struggling to meet increased demand for their services in the face of deep budget cuts. However, more than a third of the nonprofits that had already experienced funding cuts were not reducing costs to manage through the downturn. Instead, they were trying to compensate by increasing fundraising capacity.

Much has changed in the U.S. since that initial research: There is a new President, a new budget, and a stimulus package of unprecedented magnitude. At the same time, the country continues to face a prolonged downturn and profound state budget crises. We completed our follow-up survey in May 2009 to gauge the effects of these developments on nonprofit organizations. We sent this survey to the same group of leaders who received the previous survey, asking all of the same questions, along with some new ones. The May 2009 survey findings, along with Bridgespan commentary, are presented in detail in this report. The findings indicate that nonprofits are taking many of the seven steps outlined in our original report as they strive to deliver in the short term while planning for the future.

(snip)

This survey highlights just how tough times really are, and the severity with which the economic crisis is affecting nonprofits. But there are purposeful steps that organizations can take to weather economic adversity while continuing to meet the needs of their communities. And tough times can be the catalyst for improving internal operations and making it easier for people to work smarter—not just longer and harder. Bridgespan has collected insights and advice from our clients, from other nonprofit leaders and experts, and from our own leadership in our Managing in Tough Times Resource Center. We hope it will help you manage through these tough times.

http://www.linkedin.com/news?viewArticle=&articleID=47137970&gid=81092&articleURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Ebridgespan%2Eorg%2FLearningCenter%2FResourceDetail%2Easpx%3Fid%3D4296&urlhash=--G_&trk=news_discuss

Recession Hits Nonprofits Hard By Jim Hickey July 3, 2009 Vineyard Gazette Online

The recession has hit Island nonprofits hard, a recent survey by the Martha’s Vineyard Donors Collaborative has found.

Released this week and based on a survey done in May of a wide range of Vineyard charities, the six-page report by the collaborative found that 56 per cent of Vineyard nonprofits had experienced a decrease in contributions over the winter, and 20 per cent saw a dramatic decrease.

“The Vineyard has struggled like the rest of the nation as the recession takes its toll,” the report says.

The donors collaborative is an advocacy group devoted to strengthening the nonprofit community on the Vineyard.

The survey released this week warns things will likely get worse before they get better.

http://www.mvgazette.com/article.php?21806

Donor Numbers and Revenue per Donor Shrink in First Quarter ’09, July 7, 2009, Association of Fundraising Professionals

Not only is the United States seeing a drop in donor numbers since their peak in 2005, the economy has left those donors giving less.

According to the Index of National Fundraising Performance published by Target Analytics, first quarter 2009 saw the first overall decline in revenue per donor since the study began in 2002. Revenue per donor declines were experienced by two-thirds of the organizations in the index.

As each donor gives less, the problem is compounded by falling donor numbers in the U.S. that have taken place for more than three years (since the Gulf Coast hurricanes of 2005). The study indicates that in the last quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009, this gradual fall in donor numbers has increased in magnitude, suggesting that the recession is accelerating the rate of decrease in donor numbers.

"These numbers continue to underscore the extraordinary situation and challenges the charitable sector faces now," said Paulette V. Maehara, CFRE, CAE, president and CEO of AFP. "However, it's important to remember that overall, the economy currently seems to be steadying itself, albeit very slowly. While we still have a long ways to go, we are hopeful that this report represents the absolute worst of the recession's impact."

http://www.afpnet.org/ka/ka-3.cfm?content_item_id=24956&folder_id=2545

Bridgespan Study Examines Rural Funding Challenges - Study examines rural funding challenges: IDs themes for strengthening the nonprofit Sector’s capacity to tackle social issues. 20 Jul 2009 Authors: Barry Newstead & Pat Wu

The issue of nonprofit funding is topical given the economic climate, but for rural nonprofits it is a chronic reality of life. In a recent study on the rural funding gap, the Bridgespan Group found that rural nonprofits lag behind their urban counterparts in terms of their share of federal government, private foundation, and corporate donations and as such they are less well positioned to help disadvantaged residents in their communities. Funded by a grant from the Atlantic Philanthropies, the study looked at the funding structure of rural nonprofits in two sample states – California and New Mexico to understand the gap. The report identified lessons learned from successful rural youth serving organizations including National Indian Youth Leadership Program (NIYLP) in New Mexico, Boys and Girls Club of Fresno, and the Human Response Network in Northern California’s Trinity County.

(Snip)

“The rural funding gap is real and presents challenges for both rural nonprofits and private foundations that care about tackling poverty. There are no silver bullets but the themes are a good reminder for leaders of the hard work required to expand the resources available for youth and families in need in rural communities,” said Bridgespan’s Newstead.

http://atlanticphilanthropies.org/news/news/bridgespan_study_examines_rural_funding_challenges
Nonprofit medical systems see their financial health worsening -The health care sector also added fewer jobs and had more mass layoffs in 2008 than during the previous year. By Victoria Stagg Elliott, AMNews staff. Posted July 27, 2009.

The recession is continuing to pound hospital and health care finances, according to a pair of reports issued in July.

"This is not a good year for health care, just as it's not a good year for the economy," said Jon Burroughs, MD, a senior consultant with the Greeley Co. in Marblehead, Mass.

http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2009/07/27/bisb0727.htm

Charitable Giving Climate Continues to Decline, Nonprofits Say - 86 Percent Report Economy is Having Negative Effect on Fundraising, Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University Study Finds Released: August 3, 2009

The fundraising climate for U.S. charities continued to decline in the first half of 2009, according to the latest Philanthropic Giving Index (PGI) released today by the Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University.

The PGI, similar to a Consumer Confidence Index for charitable giving, includes three indexes on a scale from 0 to 100, based on a semiannual national survey of nonprofit fundraising professionals. Higher scores indicate more positive or optimistic attitudes about the climate for fundraising.

The fundraisers’ assessment of the current giving environment fell to its lowest level since the Center began the study in 1998. In the latest survey, the Present Situation Index (PSI) is at 58.0, an 8.7 percent decrease from six months ago and a 28.9 percent decrease from one year ago. The PSI has averaged 82.1 over the history of the study.

Fundraisers’ expectations for the coming six months are slightly more optimistic, but remain below the historical average for the study. The Expectations Index (EI) is at 72.8, a 10.2 percent increase from six months ago and a 13.2 percent decrease from a year ago. The overall PGI, which is an average of the current and future indexes, is at 65.4, up 0.9 percent from December 2008 and down 21 percent from this time last year.

http://www.philanthropy.iupui.edu/News/2009/08/pr-CharitableGivingClimateContinuesDecline.aspx

Impact of the 2007-09 Economic Recession on Nonprofit Organizations by Lester M. Salamon, Stephanie L. Geller, and Kasey L. Spence, Listening Post Project of Johns Hopkins University (2009)

The current recession has already resulted in serious economic costs for our nation. Although the media has focused on the downturn’s severe effects on businesses, there has been little attention on how it has impacted our country’s critical nonprofit sector. Are nonprofits facing a decline in revenues? Have nonprofits been forced to reduce their programs and services? How are nonprofits responding to these pressures and what consequences, if any, have they had to endure?

To help fill this major gap in knowledge, the Johns Hopkins Nonprofit Listening Post Project surveyed its nationwide sample of nonprofit organizations in five key fields (children and family services, elderly housing and services, education, community and economic development, and the arts) in April of 2009. Key findings from the 363 organizations responding to this Sounding include the following:

1) Significant economic stress
  • 83 percent of responding organizations reported some level of fiscal stress during the target period of September 2008 to March 2009.
  • Close to 40 percent of the organizations considered the stress to be “severe” or “very severe”.
  • Theaters and orchestras were particularly hard hit, with 73 percent of the former and half of the latter reporting “severe” or “very severe” stress.
  • But a third or more of child-serving and elderly-serving organizations also reported “severe” or “very severe” fiscal stress.
  • Contributing to this stress was a perfect storm of impacts:
  • Declining revenues (51 percent of organizations);
  • Increased costs, particularly for health benefits, underlining the importance of health benefit reform for the nation’s nonprofit human service and arts organizations;
  • Declining endowments hitting 80 percent of organizations with endowments;
  • Decreased cash flow as a result of restricted credit and government payment delays.
  • Substantial majorities of the respondents expect continuing revenue declines over the coming months, particularly from private giving and government support.
2) Impressive resilience

In the face of this fiscal stress, nonprofit organizations are displaying enormous resilience:
  • The share of organizations reporting “severe” or “very severe” fiscal stress is actually lower now than during the recession that followed 9/11 (37% vs. 51% of organizations).
  • Except for the arts organizations, sizable majorities of organizations at present are reporting that their fiscal stress is “minimal” or “moderate”.
  • This is consistent with experience in prior recessions, during which nonprofits boosted employment while for-profit employment has declined. This suggests that nonprofits are a counter-cyclical force in the economy.
  • Reflecting this, more than two-thirds of the respondents indicated that they have been “successful” or “very successful” in coping with the current fiscal crisis.
  • As a consequence, nearly three-fourths of the organizations reported being able to maintain or actually increase the number of people they serve, and this was especially true of service to vulnerable populations.
3) A range of coping strategies
To achieve this result in the face of such serious economic conditions, nonprofits have displayed unusual resolve and launched a host of inventive coping strategies:
  • Well over half of all organizations have launched new or expanded fund-raising efforts, targeting individuals, state and local government, the federal government, and foundations.
  • Substantial proportions of organizations are also tightening their belts further, cutting administrative costs, creating collaborative relationships with other nonprofits, instituting salary freezes, postponing new hires, and relying more heavily on volunteers.
  • Finally, substantial numbers of organizations are stepping up their marketing and their advocacy.
http://www.ccss.jhu.edu/pdfs/LP_Communiques/LP_Communique_14.pdf

Survey shows Utah nonprofits struggling - Donations decline while demand for services rises Aug 18, 2009
SALT LAKE CITY - A survey of 127 Utah nonprofit organizations shows the economic downturn has forced agencies to cut staff and services or revamp programs in order to survive.

The June survey, which was released Friday, was the second conducted by Community Foundation of Utah this year. In both instances, charities said their donations had declined while the demand for services increased. Rural agencies struggled the most.

Agencies say that to weather the times, they have increased collaborations with other entities and created new efficiencies and programming to meet demands. At least four agencies said they merged with others to save money .

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32463413/ns/us_news-giving/

A Current Overview of Philanthropy and the Economy – Contributed by: CCS Fund Raising, New York

http://www.givinginstitute.org/resourcelibrary/pdfs/US_Phil_and_Economy_for_Web.pdf

(NEW and current) The Chronicle of Philanthropy is Studying Staffing Trends at Charities: Help Us Draw a Reliable Picture of What's Happening Now
Nonprofit organizations nationwide have been laying off staff members and taking other steps as the economy continues to take a toll on the budgets of charities of all kinds. But how can organizations make sure they are taking the smartest steps now — and avoiding approaches that could cause their most-talented workers to leave as the recession ends and the job market expands?

Those are among the questions The Chronicle is exploring in a new survey of nonprofit organizations we urge you to fill out. Organizations that participate in the survey will get a free copy of the results, which will also be discussed at a Chronicle Webinar in October.

http://philanthropy.com/news/?id=9269&pth&utm_source=pt&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_content=lefttop

My Conclusions:

  • Based on the studies linked above, it seems no one really knows what the dollar effect is on the nonprofit sector from this recession.
  • It seems no one knows the impact of the recession and loss of nonprofits on a client population.
  • Most nonprofits worth their salt had income and expenditures in proposed budgets for 2009. In many the income and expenses were probably about a 4%-5% increase. That too is a loss. Increases in utilities, fringe benefits, salary increases and many other budget items were also lost, the invisible lose to nonprofit groups
  • While there appears no universal successful plan for fundraising and proposal writing, some local groups have been able to maintain donors even if not at the same level of giving in the past – but for most, no such plan was in place.
  • Nonprofit leaders are not alone with the plight facing them. This could be the best of times for coalescing and creating a new regional and national force of small and mid-size nonprofits for advocacy, political clout and a voice in social policy.
  • We have no idea whether the economy will begin to straighten out in 2010. We can make an educated guess It will take awhile for philanthropy to rise. In the meantime there will be fewer nonprofits actually in business. Merger does not seem to be the method of choice for survival and the delivery of services to clients.
  • Experienced leadership at the top and in middle management will leave from the stress, the lack of hope for economic change, the inability to have the board get serious about the issues and frustration/guilt about not doing the mission. Board members will begin to disappear because they have no idea what can and should be done – this is not what they signed up for.
  • This is not a great time to start a new nonprofit tax exempt organization unless you have strong local support
  • This is not a great time to think about a career change to do fundraising and grant writing.
  • It can get worse and probably will.
  • And many nonprofits will survive and live to continue to perform their missions and they may be different than they were in 2008.
What do you think?

Thursday, July 16, 2009

Beware The Nonprofit Watchdog – Charity Navigator

Here is why small and mid-size nonprofits and donors should be wary of the watchdog Charity Navigator. I am no fan of Charity Navigator. Charity Navigator is a tax exempt nonprofit organization. It holds itself out as the number one charity evaluator. Charity Navigator (CN) says of itself that they are “America's premier independent charity evaluator, (that) works to advance a more efficient and responsive philanthropic marketplace by evaluating the financial health of over 5,400 of America's largest charities.” They measure NPOs basically on previous Form 990s, a troubled, unclear and mistake prone IRS annual report. Not even CPAs agree what goes into certain financial parts of the 990 – what are administrative expenses, what are program expenses, what are fundraising expenses? Where are the issues of effectiveness, evaluation, outcomes, impact, results, change, morality, integrity and ethics in Charity Navigator's ratings? The new family of 990s may help but they are still new and will not address all the issues. Here are the problems with Charity Navigator.

Yes, there is a need for oversight and evaluation of nonprofits

There is a need for oversight of the third sector. Nonprofit organizations need to be accountable, transparent - their feet held to the fire as to what they say they are going to do. States’ Attorneys General, the Internal Revenue Service, independent groups and certain individual funding sources such as government funding and foundations are insufficient at this time to do that job.
  • But who should be doing this evaluation for the giving public?
  • What are the measurement standards?
  • Who should be reviewed?
  • How can the public trust their support will be used for the announced purposes?
  • How often should they be reviewed?
  • How can nonprofits appeal the findings?
  • How are international organizations to be reviewed?
  • How should advocacy groups be monitored?

These are important issues and there are no easy answers. Charity Navigator does not address them.

We need to assure the public that nonprofit tax exempt organizations are acting on measurable goals and objectives, that we are looking at effectiveness, outcomes, results, impact and change. Is that what Charity Navigator and others are doing? No way!

The movement to establish standards for high-performing nonprofits

On April 2009 GuideStar, BBB Wise Giving Alliance and Charity Navigator met to discuss new approaches to identifying high-performing nonprofits:

The Press Release about the meeting states:

The Alliance for Effective Social Investing, a network of nonprofit leaders, which includes the CEOs of GuideStar, Charity Navigator, BBB Wise Giving Alliance and Network For Good met in Washington, D.C. and agreed to work together to drive more funds to high-performing nonprofits.

Organized by Social Solutions, the Alliance for Effective Social Investing is an international effort to identify promising new metrics of organizations’ social impact and promote the development of a more robust environment for effective social investing - replacing financial measures as the sole barometer of an organization’s performance.

The Alliance, representing over 25 leading U.S. and European social sector organizations, is committed to supporting each other and working together to strengthen the evolving social capital market.

(Snip)

At the recent gathering (the Alliance’s second meeting) the group received updates from the Urban Institute, GuideStar and Charity Navigator about how each was moving to improve their websites and rating methodologies as well as develop new tools to support a more impactful nonprofit sector.

(Snip)

http://www.alleffective.org/news/Alliance_Press_Release_041409.pdf

Do the ratings at Charity Navigator help or hinder fundraising?

There is no mention of transparency about who become members of the CN closed membership. I wonder if the U.S. members of the Alliance have spoken loudly and forcibly that CN is hurting small and mid-size nonprofits by not including everyone required to file one of the 990 forms – or no one. There is no level playing field. There is no voice for the small and mid-size nonprofits in this group. Donors are also given a limited assortment of charities they could support.

At some point the factors for transparency and accountability of the Recovery Act (AARA) will impinge upon funded nonprofit contractors and sub-contractors.

No matter what the Alliance is attempting to do, Charity Navigator is the name of the game of ratings. See the article from CN about the media attraction listed in RESOURCES, below.

The ratings by CN are shown by numbers of stars from four stars as best and zero stars as worst.

Charity Navigator (CN) stands as the most popular, most cited, most perceived credible monitor of the nonprofit world by the nation’s press and media. For instance CNN and CN have an arrangement that CNN will use CN’s rated groups in a disaster or catastrophe, many times bypassing four star nonprofit groups on the ground in the affected community. CN should itself be held to a higher standard. In my view it does not pass muster and is dangerous to the public’s perception of the nonprofit world.

But all is not well in the CN world. Six days before Christmas 2008 the Wall Street Journal featured this article, Charity Rankings Giveth Less Than Meets the Eye - The Ratings of Nonprofits Are Often Uncharitable, Sometimes Failing to Credit Crucial Factors Such as Success Wall Street Journal by Carl Bialik. It says in part:

Call it a false sense of humanity.

It may make you feel better to know that your charitable donations are going to organizations that have been highly rated by any number of online charity rankings. But these sites fail to quantify the most-important and most elusive charity measurement: success in achieving its mission.

Like stocks, charities typically are rated by their financial numbers or by qualitative characteristics such as corporate governance -- or both. Unlike stocks, charities have no single measure akin to business profit to determine successful performance. There is a widespread search for such a number, but the challenges may be too daunting. Meanwhile, some of the measures that are used may inspire bad actors to try to game the system.

"In the nonprofit world, it is a billion times more complex," Michael Soper, a consultant to nonprofit groups based in Midway, Utah, said. "They're not here to produce a profit; they're here to provide a service."

And donors giving a relatively modest amount may not want to invest the necessary time to evaluate charities thoroughly. Their quickest recourse is to search Charity Navigator, one of the most popular sites that assigns ratings from zero to four stars to more than 5,000 nonprofit organizations that file a certain tax form with the Internal Revenue Service (some religious groups are exempt). Charities are evaluated in several financial categories, and compared to their peers. Food banks, for example, typically spend 1.9% of their expenses on administrative costs, far below the median for all charities of 9.6%. So a food bank that spends 8% on administrative expenses gets just five out of 10 possible points for that category.

"Our assumption is that the average person in our society doesn't have the time or expertise to wade through these kinds of financial statements," said Ken Berger, president and chief executive of Charity Navigator. "We're providing an analysis."

The ratings do more than measure charities; they can change them, not always for the better. Mr. Soper, the nonprofit consultant, said that some charities, focused too much on rankings, adapt to climb them, much like universities play to college rankings' criteria. Only "what gets measured gets done," said Mr. Soper.

Some critics of Charity Navigator said it can create backwards priorities, encouraging them to withhold funds instead of dispersing them. The ratings, for instance, encourage charities to keep assets in reserve that total as much as their annual budget -- and more for certain types of charities with big ongoing expenses such as museums and schools.

The National Wildlife Federation gets two stars from Charity Navigator, in part because it has on hand assets equal to about two-thirds of one year's expenses. Cynthia Lewin, senior vice president and general counsel, said that having more cash on hand would be a "breach of fiduciary duty."

(Snip – full article linked in RESOURCES)

The Washington Business Journal in January 2009 ran an article entitled In Focus: Nonprofits Making sure that the dollars do some good

U.S. charities took in $230 billion from individual donors in 2007. Now nonprofit experts are looking for ways to see if that money has any impact.

Donating to a local charity can be an incredibly rewarding experience. If the organization is smart about fundraising, it shares stories of success: Their newsletter shows photos of children smiling and laughing. The annual report reveals that a large portion of donated funds goes directly to people in need. At the awards luncheon, volunteers and recipients share heartwarming stories of changed lives, crises averted and hopes restored. Tears are shed.
Individual donors gave around $230 billion to U.S. charities in 2007, about twice the gross domestic product of India. But do they know their donations are being used to maximize social outcomes? Do they even know if they are helping recipients in any lasting way?

(Snip)

Administrative costs and fundraising prowess are key measures in one of the most popular charity-rating tools, CharityNavigator.org.

Charity Navigator, based in Mahwah, N.J., employs a star-rating system like those for restaurants or hotels. It also publishes a bevy of Top 10 lists, like “10 Slam Dunk Charities” and “10 of the Best Charities Everybody’s Heard Of.”

An estimated $10 billion in annual donations are affected by the research that donors do on the site, said Ken Berger, the chief executive officer of Charity Navigator.

He acknowledged the site is probably better at weeding out grossly wasteful organizations than it is at separating the effective from the not-so-effective.

“There arguably could be organizations that have good financials, but their outcomes are not so good,” Berger said.

An explainer on the site says the ratings should not be the only factor when making donations, but the stars overwhelm that message, Berger said. “I think what happens is some people go to the site, they type in the name, they look at the stars, they leave.”

That dynamic incenses [Steve] Butz, a former youth instructor at the Living Classrooms Foundation, a Baltimore-based nonprofit that just opened a D.C. campus. [Butz is president of Baltimore-based Social Solutions Inc., which makes software that enables human services workers to track and analyze program data.]

By rewarding nonprofits for lowering their administrative costs, “you’re valuing whoever can look the most harried and frenzied,” he said. “That’s the person the sector holds up as the gold standard.”

(Snip – full article linked in RESOURCES)

Well over 1 million nonprofit tax exempt organizations are hindered in fundraising by Charity Navigator and its self-styled assistance.

How Charity Navigator leaves you out of its rating system

There are over 1.4 million tax exempt organizations in the U.S. CN measures and lists 5,400 with 1,691 of them receiving 4 stars, barely making a dent in the charitable choices available for potential donors to consider. They limit charitable choice. They do not make the charity marketplace fair, competitive, open and transparent. It is a club with membership requirements.

Charity Navigator was developed to assist donors, not nonprofit organizations.

There are limitations and barriers to be included in the CN club:

  • Sources of Revenue: They require public support to be more than $500,000 in the most recent fiscal year.
  • Because their goal is to help individual givers, they evaluate only those charities that depend on support from individual givers.
  • Length of Operations: They require 4 years of Forms 990 to complete an evaluation. Elsewhere they say they need five years of 990s.
  • They eliminate charities that receive almost all of their funding from government grants, or from the fees they charge for their programs and services. Additionally, they exclude charities that report $0 in fundraising expenses, as they are interested only in charities that actively solicit donations from the general public.
  • If a particular region of the country is underrepresented in one of those lists, they add to that particular list a reasonable number of the largest available charities from the underrepresented region. They then combine these separate lists into a new master list of charities.
  • Very few small and mid-size NPOs will ever be listed. They will be nonexistent to the giving public who use CN to assess charitable giving
  • A nonprofit that expends funds on significant evaluation of its programs and participants will be penalized for higher administrative costs
  • An international nonprofit that provides security at its offices will have an inflated administrative cost and be downgraded.

They also look at –

  • Donor Privacy Policy - In order to meet their criteria, the charity must have a donor privacy policy in writing, guaranteeing that they will not sell or trade their donors' personal or contact information with anyone else, nor will they send mailings on behalf of other organizations. Furthermore, the policy must be prominently displayed on the charity's website or in its marketing and solicitation materials. They review each privacy policy annually when they update a charity's financial evaluation.
  • Finally they review also look at CEO Pay, Income Statement, and Mission (if known)
    From their FAQ section:

Why doesn't Charity Navigator evaluate program effectiveness?

At this time, evaluating the effectiveness of a charity's programs is out of our scope. We hope over time to expand the information we provide donors, and that includes developing a methodology for measuring an organization's output. For now we're still seeking a methodology that would allow us to apply a uniform standard to all charities and thus allow us to continue to provide donors unbiased, trustworthy ratings.

They see the IRS Form 990 as a “uniform standard”, an “unbiased, trustworthy” an original source for ratings. I shudder every time I read that. They are not looking at outcomes, impact and results. They and others may never be able to look that deeply to assist the donating public.

The issues of effectiveness - evaluation, outcomes, impact, results and change.

There are more aspects than evaluation, outcomes, impact, results and change. There are also issues of morality, integrity and ethics within each nonprofit organization. The difficulty of reaching a consensus about evaluations will be hard pressed to assess morality, integrity and ethics. Nevertheless they have been part of what has ruined too many nonprofits. The board and other staff failed to uphold standards of morality, integrity and ethics.

Nonprofits that place a high value on vital training on staff, board and constituents for one or more years may be penalized if those expenses are part of administration.

Charity Navigator competes with nonprofits - you - for funding. They are similar to those NPOs that advertise that for $x a child will be fed for one month. This is how CN phrases their plea in fundraising:

It costs Charity Navigator $1,000 to add a new charity to our database, and $100 per year to update each charity on our site.

Projects to Support
Sponsor an updated charity evaluation: $100Your contribution will enable our analysts to update a charity's financial rating and profile using the most recent data available. If you choose this project, please designate your gift as "updated evaluation" and let us know which charity you would like us to update. If current data is not immediately available, we will update the rating as soon as we receive the new information from the IRS.

Sponsor a new charity evaluation: $1,000With this contribution, our analysts will first determine whether or not the charity meets our criteria, then enter up to five IRS Forms 990 and research the charity's profile information. Please contact us if you would like to learn more about this funding opportunity.

Support a year's worth of data: $3,600Help Charity Navigator continue to directly acquire from the IRS every Form 990 filed in America just one month after the document is filed. These purchases are critical in our quest to supply America's charitable givers with evaluations based on timely financial data. With your permission, we would be pleased to recognize your support on our website. Please contact us if you would like to learn more about this funding opportunity.

Sponsor a block of charities: $8,500 Are you interested in seeing more evaluations of charities in your area, or in a specific charitable cause? Our analysts will review and select up to 10 new charities in your chosen area, determine if they meet our criteria, and prepare evaluations for our website. Please contact us if you would like to learn more about this funding opportunity.

Sponsor a study: $10,000Our in-depth studies, such as the Metro Market and CEO Compensation Studies, require that our analysts update thousands of charities and conduct additional analysis of their fiscal performance. Your contribution will help defray the costs of updating the ratings, compiling the findings and preparing these reports. Please contact us if you would like to learn more about this funding opportunity.

As you search for charities on the CN web site your search is interrupted by a solicitation for funds (emphasis in the original):.

Please contribute to Charity Navigator today. Your donation does so much good for so many--read on to find out how!

Dear Friend of Charity Navigator,

What do all of these GREAT CHARITIES doing GREAT WORK have in common?

These 9 [listed in the ad] are among an exceptional group of 1,691 charities receiving Charity Navigator’s coveted 4-star rating.

Charity Navigator rates itself as a four-star nonprofit worthy of contribution.

Conclusion

The third sector needs to be able to demonstrate to the giving public effectiveness, evaluation, outcomes, impact, results, change, morality, integrity and ethics which carry the worth of a nonprofit organization

CN has no way to measure the accomplishments or lack thereof in any charity. They have no clue what is happening as the result of the work of charities. They cannot demonstarte the change in peoples' and communities' lives affected by nonprofit groups.

They show a small wedge of light about very few charities and then claim they are the beacon on the mountain shedding light for all donors to know where wisely to give. The workhorse small and mid-size nonprofits on the Side Streets of America are not members of the CN club and are not listed on the CNN use of CN information.

CN does not and cannot show effectiveness, evaluation, outcomes, impact, results, change and morality, integrity and ethics which carry the worth of a nonprofit organization, not fiscal information.

CN does not show us their own annual 990 and other fiscal information about themselves and yet they are asking for donations. CN, because of its own serious limitations, does not help charities receive the deserved help they need. CN is a barrier to charitable giving. Our evaluations have helped millions of donors pursue effective philanthropy and influenced billions of dollars in charitable donations. But only to their club membership.

The organizations recognized by CN as worthy of four stars, the highest rating, help in the complicity against small and mid-sized nonprofits by emblazing its four star salute from CN as if it truly means something, that it is credible. The NPOs that receive the four star salute and list it at their web site have fallen into the trap of supporting CN in its meager selection of charities worth contributions. Some of those NPOs know it is a misleading rating and they short change their sister and brother groups that do not even get into CN’s website yet they put the rating up for all to see. They may be four stars but they are also being phony.

In a speech at the (Valuing Impact) conference, CN CEO Ken Berger said that sometimes he cannot sleep for worrying that Charity Navigator’s ratings (of up to 4 stars) “may do more harm than good”.

http://www.philanthrocapitalism.net/wp/2009/05/analyze-this/

Do you think?

Charity Navigator has to be called out about its weaknesses and fallibility. If the voices of the small and mid size nonprofits are not heard nationally and in local communities, nothing will change - for you. Do not be surprised if Ken Berger shows up in your area and lists the worst charities for the news media in the area. If you are one of them, what happens next?

What are your thoughts about Charity Navigator and evaluations of nonprofits for donors? What do you think can help the situation?

RESOURCES

Charity Navigator, http://www.charitynavigator.org/

Charity Navigator's New Course, Chronicle of Philanthropy, July 13, 2009.
http://philanthropy.com/giveandtake/article/1123/charity-navigators-new-course

Charity Ratings Based on Administration Costs can do More Harm Than Good by Saundra Schimmelofennig, May 20, 2009

http://informationincontext.typepad.com/good_intentions_are_not_e/2009/05/emphasis-placed-on-the-percent-charities-spend-on-administration-can-actually-lead-to-increased-wast.html

Charity Rankings Giveth Less Than Meets the Eye - The Ratings of Nonprofits Are Often Uncharitable, Sometimes Failing to Credit Crucial Factors Such as Success, Wall Street Journal by Carl Bialik, The Numbers Guy, December 19, 2008

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122963299671419401.html

Nonprofit Leaders Meet to Discuss Driving More Funds to High-Performing Organizations, from Alliance for Effective Social Investing

http://www.alleffective.org/index.html

The Fallacy Of Financial Ratios: Why Outcome Evaluation Is The Better Gauge Of Grant Worthiness by Tony Poderis

http://www.raise-funds.com/100402forum.html

See the June 1, 2009 blog about outcomes by Ken Berger, the President of CN: Announcing an Open Forum on Outcomes

http://www.kenscommentary.org/2009/06/announcing-open-forum-on-outcomes.html

Ethics and Nonprofits, Stanford Social Innovation Review by Deborah L. Rhode & Amanda K. Packel, Summer 2009

http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/ethics_and_nonprofits/

Making sure that the dollars do some good, Washington Business Journal - by Jonathan O'Connell Staff Reporter, January 30, 2009

http://washington.bizjournals.com/washington/stories/2009/02/02/focus1.html

Rating the Raters, National Council of Nonprofit Associations and the National Human Services Assembly 2005

http://www.nydic.org/nassembly/documents/Rating_the_Raters_Final_3%20.pdf

The American Institute of Philanthropy (AIP) is a nationally prominent charity watchdog service whose purpose is to help donors make informed giving decisions, American Institute of Philanthropy http://www.charitywatch.org/

For Charities and Donors, Better Business Bureau for Charities and Donors http://www.bbb.org/us/charity/

Standards and Best Practices, Evangelical Council For Financial Accountability http://www.ecfa.org/Content/ECFABestPractices.aspx

Wise Giving to Charities, Compiled by Daniel Borochoff President, American Institute of Philanthropy http://www.heartsandminds.org/articles/wisegive.htm

Evaluating Charities: How do I choose?

http://www.libraryspot.com/features/evaluatecharities.htm

The Basics: How to tell a good charity from a bad one by Liz Pulliam Weston CNN/MSNBC

http://moneycentral.msn.com/content/Savinganddebt/consumeractionguide/P58021.asp

To What End? The Importance of Outcomes and Performance by Mario Morino, Venture Philanthropy Partners, April 2008

http://www.vppartners.org/learning/enews/archive/2008/apr08.html

Analyze This from blog philanthrocapitalism by Matthew Bishop & Michael Green

http://www.philanthrocapitalism.net/wp/2009/05/analyze-this/

Social Value Assessment Tool For Nonprofit Organizations in the Public Sector For Use by an External Evaluator by David Hunter and Steve Butz, June 20 2009

http://www.alleffective.org/docs/Nonprofit-Social-Value-Assessment-Questions-Version7.pdf

CN is not the only group attempting to measure the work of nonprofits. Here is a partial list of others attempting to rate quality from the blog Philanthropy 2173:

http://philanthropy.blogspot.com/2008/11/information-markets-in-philanthropy.html

Charity Navigator is the most visible nonprofit rater and is a media darling as detailed below from their web site:

“Last year alone, more than four million donors used the site that TIME Magazine called "One of America's 50 Coolest Websites for 2006." Additionally, the site is a two-time Forbes award winner for "Best of the Web," was selected by Reader's Digest as one of the "100 Best Things about America," and was chosen by PC World as "One of America's Top Websites." In 2007, BusinessWeek inducted Charity Navigator into its "Philanthropy Hall of Fame" for "revolutionizing the process of giving." Charity Navigator was singled out in 2006, 2007 and 2008 by Kiplinger's Financial Magazine as "One of the Best Services to Make Life Easier" and Esquire Magazine recently told its readers that using our service was one of "41 Ways to Save the World."

Charity Navigator's leaders have provided expert analysis and commentary on the charitable sector for The Factor with Bill O'Reilly, most CNN programs, and each of the network morning shows--NBC's The Today Show, ABC's Good Morning America, and CBS's The Early Show. We have also appeared on FOX News, CNBC, NBC Nightly News with Brian Williams, The Newshour with Jim Lehrer, Nightline, and Comedy Central's The Daily Show, among others, and served as contributors to National Public Radio programs Morning Edition and All Things Considered. We have been profiled in Fast Company magazine, Contribute, CFO Magazine, and The Washington Post, and quoted in nearly every major American newspaper or weekly magazine. We have published editorials and articles on charity accountability, the role of government regulation in the charitable sector, fund-raising ethics, and non-profit leadership in such newspapers as The Atlanta-Journal Constitution, The Chronicle of Philanthropy, The Seattle Post-Intelligencer, and The Los Angeles Times.

In order to expand our reach and better meet the needs of our users, Charity Navigator has worked hard to establish strategic partnerships with industry leaders in other sectors. We partner with CNN to identify and highlight charities for the global network's Impact initiative, with the World Economic Forum to review and approve prospective global leaders, with Foundation Source to supply philanthropists with quantitative research data to use in making charitable investments, and with Network For Good to offer the convenience of online giving.”

Now that is scary stuff.

Add to Technorati Favorites